Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufpso.edu.co/jspui/handle/123456789/3430
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEspinel Blanco, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorValencia Ochoa, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Forero, Jorge
dc.coverage.spatialOCAÑA, NORTE DE SANTANDERen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-26T21:15:17Z
dc.date.available2021-09-26T21:15:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-04
dc.identifier.citationBlanco, Edwin & Valencia, Guillermo & Forero, Jorge. (2020). Thermodynamic, Exergy and Environmental Impact Assessment of S-CO2 Brayton Cycle Coupled with ORC as Bottoming Cycle. Energies. 13. 2259. 10.3390/en13092259.en_US
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 1996-1073en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufpso.edu.co/jspui/handle/123456789/3430
dc.description.abstractIn this article, a thermodynamic, exergy, and environmental impact assessment was carried out on a Brayton S-CO2 cycle coupled with an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) as a bottoming cycle to evaluate performance parameters and potential environmental impacts of the combined system. The performance variables studied were the net power, thermal and exergetic efficiency, and the brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) as a function of the variation in turbine inlet temperature (TIT) and high pressure (PHIGH), which are relevant operation parameters from the Brayton S-CO2 cycle. The results showed that the main turbine (T1) and secondary turbine (T2) of the Brayton S-CO2 cycle presented higher exergetic efficiencies (97%), and a better thermal and exergetic behavior compared to the other components of the System. Concerning exergy destruction, it was found that the heat exchangers of the system presented the highest exergy destruction as a consequence of the large mean temperature difference between the carbon dioxide, thermal oil, and organic fluid, and thus this equipment presents the greatest heat transfer irreversibilities of the system. Also, through the Life Cycle Analysis, the potential environmental impact of the system was evaluated to propose a thermal design according to the sustainable development goals. Therefore, it was obtained that T1 was the component with a more significant environmental impact, with a maximum value of 4416 Pts when copper is selected as the equipment material.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocañaen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsspa
dc.format.mimetypespa
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRui Xiongen_US
dc.relationhttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/energiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGITYD;ART 96
dc.relation.uri
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subjectBrayton; environmental impact; exergy; life cycle analysis; ORC; performance parametersen_US
dc.titleThermodynamic, Exergy and Environmental Impact Assessment of S-CO2 Brayton Cycle Coupled with ORC as Bottoming Cycleen_US
dc.typeArtículoen_US
dc.title.translatedEvaluación termodinámica, exergética y de impacto ambiental del ciclo de Brayton de S-CO2 junto con ORC como ciclo de fondoen_US
dc.description.abstractenglishIn this article, a thermodynamic, exergy, and environmental impact assessment was carried out on a Brayton S-CO2 cycle coupled with an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) as a bottoming cycle to evaluate performance parameters and potential environmental impacts of the combined system. The performance variables studied were the net power, thermal and exergetic efficiency, and the brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) as a function of the variation in turbine inlet temperature (TIT) and high pressure (PHIGH), which are relevant operation parameters from the Brayton S-CO2 cycle. The results showed that the main turbine (T1) and secondary turbine (T2) of the Brayton S-CO2 cycle presented higher exergetic efficiencies (97%), and a better thermal and exergetic behavior compared to the other components of the System. Concerning exergy destruction, it was found that the heat exchangers of the system presented the highest exergy destruction as a consequence of the large mean temperature difference between the carbon dioxide, thermal oil, and organic fluid, and thus this equipment presents the greatest heat transfer irreversibilities of the system. Also, through the Life Cycle Analysis, the potential environmental impact of the system was evaluated to propose a thermal design according to the sustainable development goals. Therefore, it was obtained that T1 was the component with a more significant environmental impact, with a maximum value of 4416 Pts when copper is selected as the equipment material.en_US
dc.subject.proposalspa
dc.subject.keywordsBrayton; environmental impact; exergy; life cycle analysis; ORC; performance parametersen_US
dc.subject.lembspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocañaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional UFPSO
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.ufpso.edu.cospa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocañaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.localspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículoen_US
dc.type.redcolArtículo de investigación http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART Artículo de divulgación http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTDIVspa
dc.relation.referencesDiaz, G.A.; Forero, J.D.; Garcia, J.; Rincon, A.; Fontalvo, A.; Bula, A.; Padilla, R.V. Maximum power from fluid flow by applying the first and second laws of thermodynamics. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017, 139, 032903. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, R.; Gutiérrez, A.S.; Eras, J.J.C.; Valencia, K.; Hernández, B.; Forero, J.D. Evaluation of the energy recovery potential of thermoelectric generators in diesel engines. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118412. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAngelino, G. Carbon Dioxide Condensation Cycles. J. Eneg. Power 1968, 287–295. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesDostal, V.; Driscoll, M.J.; Hejzlar, P.A. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycle for Next Generation Nuclear Reactors. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, UK, March 2004.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAbrosimov, K.A.; Baccioli, A.; Bischi, A. Techno-economic analysis of combined inverted Brayton—Organic Rankine cycle for high-temperature waste heat recovery. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2019, 3, 100014en_US
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.DOI10.3390/en13092259en_US
Appears in Collections:Artículos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons